May 6, 2014, The Director of Communications at the Human Rights Law Center in Australia urges
the Australian government to “introduce laws that would minimise the
risk of Australian policing or military assistance supporting human
rights violators.”
The Australian government funds and trains Detatchment (‘Densus’) 88,
an Indonesian anti terrorism unit which has been used to attack
peaceful West Papuans who advocate for self determination. It has been
trained in forensics, intelligence gathering, surveillance and law
enforcement by the UK, Australia and the US. However, there are serious
concerns about reports that Densus 88 is being deployed to tackle other
issues, such as
alleged separatism in Papua.
alleged separatism in Papua.
The Human Rights Law Centre’s Director of Communication, Tom Clarke,
said Australia’s support of Indonesia’s counter-terrorism unit,
Detachment 88, was in desperate need of review.
“The Australian public can have no confidence that adequate steps are
being taken to ensure Australia is not in any way complicit with human
rights abuses occurring in Indonesia’s Papuan provinces,”
“Australia has an extremely dubious record when it comes to Papua –
successive governments have turned a blind eye to the human rights
abuses occurring on our doorstep. But if we want to avoid the mistakes
of the past, we need to have a serious discussion about what type of
human rights safeguards could be introduced to ensure we don’t have
blood on our hands if atrocities continue,” said Mr Clarke.
Densus 88
Witnesses in Papua believe that Densus 88 murdered Papuan leader Mako
Tabuni. He was shot by plain clothed security officers in Jayapura.
Tabuni was a respected Papuan leader from the KNPB a non-violent
organisation calling for a referendum on Papua’s political future. In
2009 Densus 88 was involved in the killing of Kelly Kwalik, a leader of
Papua’s resistance movement who had denounced violence.
 |
| Members of the formidable Detachment 88 anti terrorism unit |
In August 2011, Densus 88 took part in investigations into murders in
Nafri, Jayapura. The investigations involved arbitrary detention,
maltreatment and the torture of 15 people. In March 2012, National
Police spokesman Insp. Gen. Saud Usman Nasution confirmed that Densus 88
officers were in Papua to help the local police fight armed militias.
He justified their presence; ‘Terrorism is not only limited to radicals
waging jihad. By the definition set under the 2003 Terrorism Law,
terrorism refers to any act that can cause unrest.’
In July 2012, leading Indonesian human rights NGO, KontraS, published
research on the conduct of Densus 88, based on monitoring of operations
in Aceh, Maluku, Java and Central Sulawesi from 2006–2012. The report
states that during this period, Densus 88 operations commonly involved
arbitrary arrest and detention, torture and other degrading treatment,
physical abuse, and injury causing death.
The Act of No Choice
In addition to Mr Clarke’s comments regarding Australia’s relations
with Indonesia, he used the occasion of the 51st anniversary since the
UN handed temporary control of West Papua to Indonesia to make a clear
statement on the illegitimacy of the so called Act of Free Choice.
“There’s a reason many Papuans refer to the Act of Free Choice as the
‘Act of No Choice’ – it was an incredibly flawed process. Under severe
duress, including threats of violence from senior ranking military
officials, 1025 hand-picked Papuans were forced to vote on behalf of a
population of one million. This anniversary is another reminder of the
various injustices that continue to this day in Papua,” said Mr Clarke.